To: RobbyS; Amityschild; Brad's Gramma; Cvengr; DvdMom; firebrand; GiovannaNicoletta; Godzilla; hope; ..
She is a most holy human being who chose to have this happen. She is no more divine than the other saints, but she is first among them as mother of the savior the first Christian. WRONG.
That
IS
CONTRARY TO SCRIPTURE. CHRIST HIMSELF NOTED QUITE FIRMLY AND CLEARLY that John the Baptist was THE GREATEST OF ALL MORTALS BORN OF WOMEN.
Or is there now a new Dogma that Mary was born of angels? ET's?
Or maybe that as an infant, she floated down from Heaven on a large white hankey?
It's hard to keep up with all the new Marian heresies propagating like . . . abundantly, from the Vatican edifice.
80 posted on
04/09/2010 3:33:49 AM PDT by
Quix
(BLOKES who got us where we R: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: Quix
Well, Jesus himself was a “mortal born of woman.” Besides, Jesus was talking about the greatness of John. I don’t see “even greater than my mother anyway, btw.” ;-)
81 posted on
04/09/2010 4:20:03 AM PDT by
RobbyS
(Pray with the suffering souls.)
To: Quix
” . . . but she is first among them as mother of the savior the first Christian. . . .”
. . . and powerless to lead her own children to Christ after having raised them together! (John 7:5)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson