Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Quix

“Would be happy to read what you’re getting at vis a vis the scribes and pharisees.”

OK. That is all I am asking. Again, it may well be that in your mind adding color and caps to what you say is not the equivalent of shouting. I will extend you the courtesy of taking you at your word. But, please understand, it does appear that way, at least to some. Remember what Teddy Roosevelt said, “Speak without caps and colors, but carry a big stick.” ... or something like that.

Here is the point. The Sadducees, who held the office of high priest most often, were content to be in charge of the temple and its rites. In these things they placed their trust. And in this they were united. They tended to understand the government/organization (call it what you will) of the faithful as being a top down arrangement with themselves, naturally, at the top. The Pharisees, who were more numerous, were insistent about their personal piety and a personal relationship with God founded on said piety. And in this they were united. They tended to understand the government/organization of the faithful as being a bottom up arrangement with themselves, naturally, as the best exemplars.

Jesus called them both wrong.

My interest is in this: How did they get to be the way they were? Are their aberrations not recorded as examples for our learning/admonition also even as St. Paul said in 1 Corinthians of Israel in the wilderness?

So, there you are. Unfortunately, I have to go to work and will have to leave this discussion for now.


491 posted on 03/17/2010 9:28:07 AM PDT by Belteshazzar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 484 | View Replies ]


To: Belteshazzar

Thanks.

I’m well aware of the net conventions and assumptions about CAPS. I’ve had a terminal or computer in my home since 1976.

I’ve long been known to march to a different drummer from that of the masses.

Thanks for elaborating on your points.

I’d like you to tease out, when you’re available again, a bit more about Christ’s declarations about their being wrong and what He insisted was right, instead.

It seems to me that Christ insisted that an ongoing RELATIONSHIP VIA HIS BLOOD BOUGHT SALVATION—and our acceptance of Him as our Savior—AN ONGOING RELATIONSHIP with The Father, Son, Holy Spirit was the key issue.

. . . a dance . . . with God . . . so to speak.


497 posted on 03/17/2010 9:56:45 AM PDT by Quix (BLOKES who got us where we R: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 491 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson