Oh no, betty boop, you got that backwards. You claim that something exists. I say prove it. That is not denial of God, that is doubting your claim. It is not the doubt but the claim that is burdened by proof.
You know very well that He IS, kosta.
Really? And how do you know what I know? Mind reading?
You're just playing games with us.
And what do you call when someone claims that something is, can't describe, it can't define it, measure it, weight it, see it, or in any way prove that it is, yet you insist that it is, and also that I know that it is?!
You are not paying attention, kosta. I thought I had made myself clear when I said (repeatedly) that God is not subject to the type of proof you are insisting on. You seemed to have acknowledged this in an earlier post, when you said, "you can't measure God or detect him with a microscope."
So, given proof of this type is unavailable, what is it you want from me?
Done - the empty tomb.