To: raynearhood; ShadowAce; Dr. Eckleburg; xzins; blue-duncan; P-Marlowe; Mr Rogers
Alrighty! So, here's that long reply I promised ShadowAce Most of us don't have time for the "long replies". Just give us the Readers Digest version.
I, for one, do not read responses that don't fit on a single screen on my computer. Sorry, but I don't. I doubt if most people do.
208 posted on
03/02/2010 7:58:38 PM PST by
P-Marlowe
(LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
To: P-Marlowe
That’s a strange comment. The guy takes the time and makes the effort to present his position and you’re too busy to read it.
209 posted on
03/02/2010 8:02:13 PM PST by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: P-Marlowe
I, for one, do not read responses that don't fit on a single screen on my computer. Sorry, but I don't. I doubt if most people do.
Dang! (as I snap my finger and kick the air)
Just give us the Readers Digest version.
Children that die in infancy go to heaven. This is why the Calvinist believes it:
[insert my long reply]
Hey, you asked the question of me, I gave a thorough reply. It's thoroughness should cut back on the time you would have otherwise spent replying to shorter replies. In effect, my long reply actually gives you more time than a short reply would.
Just sayin'.
212 posted on
03/02/2010 8:15:49 PM PST by
raynearhood
("As for you, when wide awake you are asleep, and asleep when you write"-Jerome (Against Vigilantius))
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson