Your posts read as angry indictments against God.
INDEED.
And, sadly . . .
as some sort of implied indictment . . .
against those who would have the audacity to stupidly believe in God without
. . . ‘tangible scientific proof’ . . .
When the perspective of all the pseudo-super-rationalists I’ve ever had ‘dialogue’ with
was well entrenched in the strategy and rationale that
THEY HAD WALLED OFF ANY POSSIBILITY OF ANY ‘PROOF’ WHATSOEVER
UNLESS
GOD ALMIGHTY KOWTOWED TO, SUBMITTED TO,
THEIR construction on reality.
Talk about hubris! Sheesh.