Seems trivial if not naive. Wouldn't his appearance be sufficient proof to the rest of the world (including the Sanhedrin)? Anyone could have rolled away the stone; a resurrected Jesus with his wounds still intact would be convincing beyond any doubt.
Are you saying that you wonder why He didn’t show Himself to the opposition?
Oh, just for you to reject those same appearances - LOL. An empty tomb with the stone rolled away is a very clear witness.
Anyone could have rolled away the stone;
Not when it is sealed and under roman guard
a resurrected Jesus with his wounds still intact would be convincing beyond any doubt.
And that occurred - yet you reject it - you reject the very evidence you demand.