Wow, kosta... You must have really hit a nerve. That’s one of nastier attacks I’ve seen on the religious forums.
Nonsense.
The perspective involved asserts all manner of things about God.
The nature of the assertions is rather integral to a particular pseudo-super-rationalist perspective, in my experience.
The nature of the assertions has been extensively and rather tediously going back and forth ad nauseum over reasons for and against certain ideations about God and the evidence for God; Christianity, Scripture etc. in the starkest and most intensely pointed terms.
Replying in kind may be tricky but is not to be avoided if one is serious about anything approaching an even-handed ‘dialogue.’
This is a philosophical/ religious/ spiritual/ cosmological/ reason/ thought-processes/ reality sort of discussion.
Talking about those aspects of reality necessarily involves . . . uhhhhh . . . those aspects of reality.
The other side seems happy to let the chips fall where they may in their presentation of their assertions.
It’s only, evidently, when the chips grow uncomfortable that the !!!!DEMAND!!!!! is issued that only the most sanitized assertions be allowed from the our side.
Color me underwhelmed.
It seems to be 'open season' on Religion Forum. I get at least a couple of posts on each page about me, my motives, my being lost, not engaging or being afraid to engage life, suggesting that I "have kids," etc. Quite pathetic.