Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WHO REALLY IS 'ANTI-CATHOLIC?'
Alpha and Omega Ministries ^ | 1-23-10 | James Swan

Posted on 02/24/2010 9:36:26 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,381-1,399 next last
To: Dr. Eckleburg
Interesting article ...and timely

It was Constantine that started what we call the Roman Catholic branch of the catholic church.

The churches I attended always had "St. So&so Roman Catholic church" on there signs and they still do. That distinguishes them from some of the orthodox churches and makes sense

As a catholic that was not "insulting", the mass at one time was in Latin, the popes were always Italian, the Vatican is in Rome and the church was started by a Roman emperor . Before that time, there were home churches and most of what Catholics call tradition came after his "conversion ". The roots of the RC are from Italy/Rome

101 posted on 02/24/2010 11:48:42 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary
Quick, hide in here
102 posted on 02/24/2010 11:49:08 AM PST by 1000 silverlings (everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings

They just project on others what they do themselves maybe?


103 posted on 02/24/2010 11:49:08 AM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Ken4TA

I AGREE.


104 posted on 02/24/2010 11:51:19 AM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl

I don’t see how I can answer that without making it personal.

;-)

I don’t think that disagreeing with us is a conclusive sign that the disagree-er is anti-Catholic.


105 posted on 02/24/2010 11:52:00 AM PST by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Christian_Capitalist
"Papist" is descriptively accurate, and could hardly be considered a derogatory term by those whose ecclesiology is Papist rather than Conciliar or Congregational -- unless one were to acknowledge that obedience to the Papacy is a bad thing...

The word is a reformation word.. today the politically correct see it as an insult or something.. but it is a historically valid word (as is protestant:)

106 posted on 02/24/2010 11:52:58 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Alamo-Girl
I eschew all the doctrines and traditions of men across the board. I'm just a Christian, plain and simple.

Nonsense. Everyone has a tradition, everyone has an interpretation.

107 posted on 02/24/2010 11:54:17 AM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: word_warrior_bob

what a hoot!!!


108 posted on 02/24/2010 11:55:15 AM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: ajr276
Early Christians certainly didn’t think that loyalty to the bishop was an un-Catholic matter, and there were some pretty crummy bishops.

The title Bishop means overseer, there is no apostolic succession taught in scripture.

Christ picked His apostles, He never transfered the right to men or He would have told us that in scripture..

109 posted on 02/24/2010 11:56:16 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
This is a very good article. Succinct and directly to the point.

The Roman Catholics want it both ways. They want to define the term Catholic in a manner in which it only refers to Romanists, and then apply the term Anti-Catholic to all who find error in the Romanist tradition.

Inasmuch as I believe fully in the gospel once given to all the saints and the gospel preached by Paul and the Apostles (as enunciated in Galatians) that would make me Catholic.

So anyone who would disparage my theological views would, by definition, have to be considered "Anti-Catholic".

110 posted on 02/24/2010 11:57:17 AM PST by P-Marlowe (LPFOKETT GAHCOEEP-w/o*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings

I’ll join you all in a minute....


111 posted on 02/24/2010 11:57:25 AM PST by Marysecretary (GOD IS STILL IN CONTROL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Eckleburg
As Orwell said, whoever controls the language, controls the debate.

I was just thinking of that but could not remember the citation

112 posted on 02/24/2010 11:57:48 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Quix
NO SYSTEM can be God . . . nor ought to be treated as God.

Amen

113 posted on 02/24/2010 11:58:34 AM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

Some folks are only capable of cheering on the angry mob from the sidelines like the tormentors of Christ as he carried the cross. Take a wild guess on which side you fall in this analogy.


114 posted on 02/24/2010 12:02:39 PM PST by word_warrior_bob (You can now see my amazing doggie and new puppy on my homepage!! Come say hello to Jake & Sonny)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Campion; Quix
Their Council of Trent explicitly rejected the Gospel in an official declaration.

Champion, what is the gospel, if Trent did not anathematize that held to it?

115 posted on 02/24/2010 12:03:41 PM PST by RnMomof7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Marysecretary

wear pink


116 posted on 02/24/2010 12:06:10 PM PST by 1000 silverlings (everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
there is no apostolic succession taught in scripture.

In my Bible, Paul embues Timothy with his authority.

117 posted on 02/24/2010 12:10:31 PM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: SoothingDave; RnMomof7

Who’d Timothy embue?


118 posted on 02/24/2010 12:12:16 PM PST by 1000 silverlings (everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: 1000 silverlings

Not relevant. The point is that the Apostles (Paul, in this case) are clearly in Scripture passing on their authority to other new leaders as the Church grew into new areas.

That’s apostolic succession.


119 posted on 02/24/2010 12:14:28 PM PST by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: RnMomof7
The title Bishop means overseer, there is no apostolic succession taught in scripture.

Right. I can not find that in Scripture anywhere.

Where did that come from any way?


120 posted on 02/24/2010 12:15:21 PM PST by rdb3 (The mouth is the exhaust pipe of the heart. WHO DAT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 1,381-1,399 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson