Posted on 02/24/2010 9:36:26 AM PST by Dr. Eckleburg
You.
Pinging a few who may have had the charge leveled against them.
Thank you for your apt illustration of what this article is saying.
Thank you for always posting threads and posts in a way that proves me right in my assessment of you.
Satan is really, really anti-Catholic.
What in this article do you disagree with (assuming you've read the article?)
As is the case with the other queer elements of their dogma.
Catechism 22
Certainly true when using the term “catholic” in the sense of Christ’s universal church on earth.
I was joking btw!
Yes. Fruit-wise, very true.
I’ve been declared a bigot simply for posting on a thread. Any thread.
After going to the link, and reading some of the junk there, I conclude this thread is a complete waste of time. I encourage all Catholics to see for themselves what a piece of anti-Catholic garbage has been posted here.
The anti-Catholic wrote:
“Recent mega-convert Francis Beckwith concurs:”
Mega-convert?
“Their Council of Trent explicitly rejected the Gospel in an official declaration.”
Only a moron or a bigot would make that claim. Both descriptions might apply here.
“How does one precisely refer to those in communion with Rome and obedient to the Bishop of Rome? Contrary to Beckwith, I’ve seriously considered using the word “Romanist.” The term describes those devoted to the papacy quite succinctly.”
Using a term based on a city’s name “describes those devoted to the papacy quite succinctly”? Exactly how?
“No one wants to be thought of as a bigot.”
Apparently anti-Catholics don’t mind.
“However, in the same Catholic Answers broadcast cited above, Tim Staples and his co-host positively referred to themselves as “Romanists” introducing their “open forum for non-Catholics” show, in which they only take calls from those outside of their worldview. Here is the mp3 clip. Perhaps they were kidding, although it’s hard to tell.”
Uh, yes, they were most definitely kidding. That was the whole point.
I preach the Holy Word of G-d andshalom b'SHEM Yah'shua HaMashiach
am being accused of being anti-catholic.There is message in that bottle.
You wrote:
“FReepers post articles to discuss the articles.”
I don’t think that’s what anti-Catholics do.
“What in this article do you disagree with (assuming you’ve read the article?)”
How often have you brought up other issues completely unrelated to the actual opening post in an anti-Catholic thread just so you could vent your beliefs in supposed Mary worship among Catholics?
Great points.
The duplicities of the edifice are evident yet again.
You wrote:
“I preach the Holy Word of G-d and
am being accused of being anti-catholic.”
You do not preach the word of God. You simply preach your own sectarian beliefs and call them the word of God.
“There is message in that bottle.”
Which you’re probably reading through the bottom of the bottle after having drained it.
From where I sit . . .
only or primarily . . . most likely . . .
he is against those Roman Catholics et al in clusters of Charismatic worship and teaching which properly focus the individuals back on GOD, CHRIST, FIRST, FOREMOST, ONLY . . . BY HIS SPIRIT.
The rest of the edifice is carrying out slewfoot’s RELIGIOUS agenda quite well.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.