2. Repetition . . . I don’t think ANY FOYF [Folks of Your Flavor] (Hey, Mad Dawg, there's your acronym definition...and I thought you were taking a nap!!!) have a leg to stand on in complaining to ME about repetition. Sheesh. There are about 2-3 DOZEN of FOYF who are exceedingly redundant and repetitious year after year after year and some in the most shrill and obnoxious terems repeatedly repeatedly repeatedly repeatedly . . . did I say repeatedly?
I agree that posts that consist of nothing other than 3,265 links to other FR threads or other websites, without any explanatory content, are not beneficial (maybe one in a thousand might click on something, but more than likely not).
And it is true that it starts to get to be a lot of "you did", "no I didn't," "did," "didn't," "did," "didn't," "did," "didn't," "did," "didn't," "did," "didn't," "did," "didn't," "did," "didn't," -- but it really works both ways. (And, no, I haven't seen you involved when it denigrates down to that level)
The discourse could be a whole lot better on all sides.
INDEED.
Which was why I was willing to attempt—and still am—with MarkBsnr and any kindly so disposed folks . . .
to come up with a solution to such dreadful hogwash between the two camps.
The finger frothing cliques tend to insist . . . as usual . . . that any whatever
MUST ABSOLUTLEY MUST [!!!!CONTROL!!!!!] BE ON THEIR TERMS AND THEIR TERMS ONLY.
Even the terminally clueless should know THAT’S NOT going to be; NOT going to work.
Sigh.
Keep pinging me to this conversation, please. I’ll keep up as I can.