Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
That word was coined AFTER the Council of Trent.

So what?

LOL

You need to think of Trent as judicial, not legislative. The Council ruled on many things already in longstanding use.

Do you not understand that a thing or category of things can exist long before given a name?

Do you think DNA did not exist prior to the twentieth century?

4,612 posted on 01/18/2010 2:43:00 PM PST by Petronski (In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4611 | View Replies ]


To: Petronski

“The Council ruled on many things already in longstanding use.”

Yes. So what were the Deuterocanonicals called before the term “Deuterocanonical” was coined in 1566?

If you want me to use Deuterocanonical instead of Apocrypha, why? After all, I can USUALLY spell Apocrypha without error...and I’m pretty proud when I can do that with a word that has 4 silla...syllibl...parts.

And you want me to start using a word that has 7?


4,615 posted on 01/18/2010 2:48:29 PM PST by Mr Rogers (I loathe the ground he slithers on!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4612 | View Replies ]

To: Petronski; Quix; Mr Rogers; Forest Keeper; Dr. Eckleburg; blue-duncan; 1000 silverlings
You need to think of Trent as judicial, not legislative. The Council ruled on many things already in longstanding use.

And people need to know it is still fully enforced and affirmed by every pope.

A sample of trent

If any one shall deny that the body and blood together with the soul and divinity of our Lord Jesus Christ, and therefore entire Christ, are truly, really, and substantially contained in the sacrament of the most holy Eucharist; and shall say that He is only in it as a sign, or in a figure, or virtually -- let him be accursed (Canon 1).

If any one shall say that the substance of the bread and wine remains in the sacrament of the most holy Eucharist, together with the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ, and shall deny that wonderful and singular conversion of the whole substance of the bread into the body, and of the whole substance of the wine into the blood, the outward forms of the bread and wine still remaining, which conversion the Catholic Church most aptly calls transubstantiation -- let him be accursed (Canon 2).

If any man shall say that Christ, the only begotten Son of God, is not to be adored in the holy sacrament of the Eucharist, even with the open worship of latria, and therefore not to be venerated with any peculiar festal celebrity, nor to be solemnly carried about in processions according to the praiseworthy, and universal rites and customs of the holy Church, and that he is not to be publicly set before the people to be adored, and that his adorers are idolaters -- let him be accursed (Canon 6).

If anyone shall say that the ungodly man is justified by faith only so as to understand that nothing else is required that may cooperate to obtain the grace of justification, and that it is in no wise necessary for him to be prepared and disposed by the motion of his own will ... let him be accursed (Canon 9).

If anyone shall say that justifying faith is nothing else than confidence in the divine mercy pardoning sins for Christ's sake, or that it is that confidence alone by which we are justified ... let him be accursed (Canon 12).

Such loving anathemas from the "church of LOVE" that thinks it awful to ask God to judge a pro abortionist

Can you spell hypocrite?

4,645 posted on 01/18/2010 3:54:27 PM PST by RnMomof7 (Here I stand. I can do no other. God help me. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4612 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson