Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Natural Law

They don’t do the word study on zakar or on memory in general. They don’t believe in eternity. They do not see that the Eucharist is not a repetition. They HAVE to argue that we are repeating something and they’re wedded to the idea that we are wrong, so they have to exclude certain concepts.


2,631 posted on 01/13/2010 1:42:34 PM PST by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2615 | View Replies ]


To: Mad Dawg; Dr. Eckleburg; NoGrayZone
Well here's the thing. It was called "the last supper". It was a meal. A meal shared by Christ and his disciples. They broke bread and they passed around a cup, in remembrance of Him

When did it become an actual crucifixtion? Who's idea was this? Where is the scripture?

You say the priest is not another Christ. Then the priest has the power, over God, to call Him down from heaven and offer Him up as a sacrifice. Do you see anything wrong with this?

To get around that, then the priest himself becomes Christ and offers Himself up. You then all get to participate in the original crucifixtion. Where is the scripture to support this rite?

2,633 posted on 01/13/2010 1:52:11 PM PST by 1000 silverlings (everything that deceives, also enchants: Plato)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2631 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson