Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: sitetest

The Orthodox have largely exited FR based in part upon the perceived churlishness of the Latins. And I completely understand their point of view. I am ashamed of how some of us have treated some of them.

Read your post. The Catholic Church is all of the Catholic Church, not just a segment of it. What a dumb thing to post.


2,344 posted on 01/12/2010 7:21:21 PM PST by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2315 | View Replies ]


To: MarkBsnr
Dear MarkBsnr,

Sorry, I'm just not gettin’ all worked up about it.

If you read through my posts, I make significant effort to speak clearly and without “churlishness.” Here, we're discussing ontology, and my correspondent says of the Catholic Church's understanding:

"It wouldn't be the first corruption of Greek by the west, for sure.”

Now, if he wants to make a dig, well, lots of that goes on at FR. But often, when the conversation starts to degnerage in that way, I try to remind myself that it would be better to start to disengage than to descend slowly into the gutter with my interlocutor. I wish I always did this, I don't. But this time, I did.

“The Catholic Church is all of the Catholic Church, not just a segment of it.”

Yes, and the Orthodox Churches are not quite the Catholic Church. Here is a thread posted a couple of years ago and recently resurrected:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-religion/1863482/posts

It's a CDF discussion about the status and essential elements of other churches and ecclesial bodies. I think a fair reading of it supports what I've said about the differences between the Catholic and the Orthodox Churches.

As for churishness generally, I've been here for a little while, and have interacted with and watched the interactions with Orthodox posters. We Catholics have nothing on them in this category.


sitetest

2,352 posted on 01/12/2010 7:39:46 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2344 | View Replies ]

To: MarkBsnr
Dear MarkBsnr,

Interestingly, you still haven't pointed out where I wasn't even close to the truth in the first sentences of mine that you cited from post 2023.

Do you still think that there's something that I said that wasn't close to the truth?


sitetest

2,354 posted on 01/12/2010 7:44:21 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2344 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson