Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex; boatbums
In order to be a heretic one has to be informed of the true faith, and then reject it. A Buddhist or, possibly, a Mormon is not a heretic, he is someone of a different faith. Protestants are heretics insofar as they understand and reject Catholicism.

Yes, that was my understanding of the Catholic view. I have heard the term "separated brothers" used for some in Protestantism, which I take to mean that a heretic is better off (closer to the Catholic faith) than someone of a different faith altogether.

Since 20c Protestantism does not seem to even understand itself any more, I hesitate to apply the term to latter day Protestants. They are simply confused people, no comment on the present polite company.

Thank you, and yes, if Protestantism is defined as anything claiming to be Christian which is not Apostolic, then I would agree that such a group would be too far all over the place to be termed as one group. However, if we narrowed it to the Protestant Bible-believing Arminians and Calvinists with whom you regularly interact on FR, then maybe a case could be made for heresy? :)

1,617 posted on 01/11/2010 12:32:59 AM PST by Forest Keeper ((It is a joy to me to know that God had my number, before He created numbers.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1578 | View Replies ]


To: Forest Keeper; boatbums
maybe a case could be made for heresy?

May be. Why is it important to you?

Remember, aside from the technical meaning the word is used broadly. "Dumping the changed oil in the sewer is heretical".

1,862 posted on 01/11/2010 4:55:34 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1617 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson