Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: the_conscience; Dr. Eckleburg
That would be making it an ad hom. There is no such implication with Romanist or Roman Catholic.

"Romanist" is an offensive term: Definition by Webster

"Roman Catholic" has origins as an offensive term, but generally is no longer considered one. To use it to describe the entire Catholic Church is usually understood, but is inaccurate.

Dr. Eckleburg's suggestion allows all three branches of Christianity a universal conception.

If we're speaking about the "three branches of Christianity" (and we are, as all three groups profess Trinitarian Christianity), then Dr. Eckleburg needs a new term for the group that the average American would consider "Protestant Christians".

105 posted on 01/06/2010 7:48:08 AM PST by GCC Catholic (0bama, what are you hiding? Just show us the birth certificate...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: GCC Catholic
"Romanist" is an offensive term: Definition by Webster

It's descriptive of the Church of Rome and any offense is merely on the part of the person who believes it's offensive.

If we're speaking about the "three branches of Christianity" (and we are, as all three groups profess Trinitarian Christianity), then Dr. Eckleburg needs a new term for the group that the average American would consider "Protestant Christians".

Protestant Christians believe themselves to be Catholic so then Romanists and Orthodox need a new term.

117 posted on 01/06/2010 8:03:20 AM PST by the_conscience (I'm a bigot: Against Jihadists and those who support despotism of any kind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson