Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who are the Catholics: The Orthodox or The Romanists, or both?
Me

Posted on 01/05/2010 9:46:47 PM PST by the_conscience

I just witnessed a couple of Orthodox posters get kicked off a "Catholic Caucus" thread. I thought, despite their differences, they had a mutual understanding that each sect was considered "Catholic". Are not the Orthodox considered Catholic? Why do the Romanists get to monopolize the term "Catholic"?

I consider myself to be Catholic being a part of the universal church of Christ. Why should one sect be able to use a universal concept to identify themselves in a caucus thread while other Christian denominations need to use specific qualifiers to identify themselves in a caucus thread?


TOPICS: Catholic; General Discusssion
KEYWORDS: 1holyapostolicchurch; apostates; catholic; catholicbashing; catholicwhiners; devilworshippers; eckleburghers; greeks; heathen; orthodoxyistheone; papistcrybabies; proddiecatholic; robot; romanistispejorative; romanists; romanistwhinefest; romannamecallers; russians
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 12,201-12,204 next last
To: Running On Empty

All of that is lovely. Thanks.

Bedtime. Alleluia.


861 posted on 01/08/2010 6:11:08 PM PST by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 860 | View Replies]

To: Quix
Which was why I was willing to attempt—and still am—with MarkBsnr and any kindly so disposed folks .

I will take this as a compliment, Quix. I would work to the betterment of all men, including those who spend time on the RF. Now, if I could just get some incense and a bunch of Hail Marys to the Protestants on here, the world would be a much better place. :)

862 posted on 01/08/2010 6:24:04 PM PST by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 801 | View Replies]

To: annalex
When a known non-Catholic approaches to receive, the presumption of being in the state of grace cannot be made, and the Eucharist is withheld.

The part of what you wrote that I bolded clearly conveys the view that a state of grace is presumed for Catholics and not for non-Catholic Christians.

That definitely is portraying non-Catholic Christians as 'less saved', or 'less Christian', or something.

Please feel welcome to state it in your own terms.

863 posted on 01/08/2010 6:30:00 PM PST by Dr. North
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 857 | View Replies]

To: annalex

First, I am more than familiar with scripture as are many on this thread, and other religious threads as well. I think maybe you might mean we each apply scripture differently to how we see faith, salvation, life and doctrines, etc.

For what I’ve studied Jesus’ crucifixtion and ressurection was a one-time event, and included in that He did indeed say...”It is finished.” I have no problem accepting a one-time event which covers it all..”once..and for all.” Just as was said.

As to my judgement for sin? That has and is paid for, done, and over....”Therefore, there is now no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus”... and how sweet that sound is indeed... And Those words were spoken directly after the apostle struggled with the question of sin...”who will save me?...” Pretty familiar struggle to me, and likely many.

I realize many in some churches have a difficult time accepting Christ did it all...and believe works are necessary and/or condem them in the herafter. But I have found only that rewards will be offered, and even these we will lay at his feet, for any good we do is from Him. His death either “finished” paying the price or not and if not we are all lost forever.

I can only agree we’ll disagree..and Christ to direct us all beyond that which can sometimes bind people.
For there is no such thing as a perfect church, it is indeed filled with sinners, and the only true thing that seperates us one from the other are those saved sinners and those who are not saved sinners....and they are all found within every church. That’s who we are...or will become.

We all do learn here on these threads but I think more would were it not for the bickering between these good debates and opinions shared. People jump to conclusions and strike with their words. (there is a difference of defending the faith and lashing out. When we lash out the rythum of the debate then gets lost as the battles of exchange rage. Guess we each need to discern why strike?


864 posted on 01/08/2010 6:30:31 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 846 | View Replies]

To: annalex
Extra Ecclesiam nulla salus

Sans Jesu Christe, nulla salus est.

865 posted on 01/08/2010 6:32:37 PM PST by Dr. North
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 855 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Thanks for your understanding.

I use the net as reinforcement/reward for a break and for XX amount of time on task.

I have the new section on assignments/tasks 99% done. And the other two sections on bio and HUMAN FACTORS IN EDUCATIONAL PHILOSPHY AND EXPECTATIONS will not take that long. PTL.

Then to get the grade sheets with each students’ name on their Xcel pages and the dates redone . . .

And then the attendance cards.

Thankfully, first class is not until Tues afternoon.

I have plenty of time. I just need to avoid dwaddling.

LOL.


866 posted on 01/08/2010 6:32:54 PM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 843 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

I think there are lots of paradoxes in all large organizations, particularly old and large ones.


867 posted on 01/08/2010 6:34:05 PM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 845 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

I dearly love congregational prayer wherein most of the folks are praying earnestly outloud all at once.

Love it.


868 posted on 01/08/2010 6:37:11 PM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 850 | View Replies]

To: Dr. North

(pppst: “sans” French - “Sine” Latin)


869 posted on 01/08/2010 6:37:40 PM PST by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 865 | View Replies]

To: Mad Dawg

Great explanations.


870 posted on 01/08/2010 6:41:03 PM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 858 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr

Yes it’s a compliment.

LOL re the insense etc.


871 posted on 01/08/2010 6:42:33 PM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 862 | View Replies]

To: caww

Great points.


872 posted on 01/08/2010 6:43:31 PM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 864 | View Replies]

To: Dr. North
a state of grace is presumed for Catholics and not for non-Catholic Christians.

Yes. That is because a Catholic is instructed to examine his conscience before presenting himself for Holy communion, and seek sacramental absolution if the examination warrants it. The absolution restores the state of grace. The same presumption cannot be made about a non-Catholic.

873 posted on 01/08/2010 6:45:56 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 863 | View Replies]

To: Hegewisch Dupa

Have you ever looked at the history of how Wikiipedia came about, whose site and sponsers, and how they put the definitions etc. together? Very intersting...and their definitions can often be tainted and slanted. I don’t use it often unless possibly for other source references they may give. I very suspecious of their actual history presentations and most they present. Anybody can add to what they have defined as well.


874 posted on 01/08/2010 6:45:59 PM PST by caww
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 806 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Were the Pilgrims and early colonists in New England Puritan Calvinists? Certainly.

They were actually the proto Communists 200 years before Marx. They held property communal and owned everything jointly. It is just that some became first amongst equals. I find it odd that the Calvinists bruit about their championship of American capitalism, when the first Calvinists over here practiced proto Communism, and their descendants in the North East are currently the bastion of the liberal Democrat Party.

875 posted on 01/08/2010 7:01:38 PM PST by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 704 | View Replies]

To: caww

Definitely the sacrifice of the Cross was one for all times. However, it does not mean that it applies to everyone based on a mere profession of faith (Matthew 7:21). Were it so, there would be no Sermon on the Mount, no discourse on works-based judgement in Matthew 25, no exhortations to virtue with which St. Paul finishes his every letter, no demand for obedience and total submission to the will of Christ that we have in every Gospel (for example, Luke 18:22), no call to prayer (Matthew 5:44), forgiveness (Mark 11:26), conversion (Luke 13:3) and frequent (1 Cor. 11:25-26) reception of the Eucharist (John 6:54). These are exhortations repeated often, not isolated open to interpretation verses. Christ did put you on the road of salvation, but quite a bit of continuing work is required of you to walk it.


876 posted on 01/08/2010 7:03:59 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 864 | View Replies]

To: Quix

My kid goes to a church in Lotus land where at a certain point in the intercessions it’s “Free-for-all”. She says instead of taking turns everyone just says the name or whatever that he wants God to remember. She says she likes it a lot.


877 posted on 01/08/2010 7:04:04 PM PST by Mad Dawg (Oh Mary, conceived without sin, pray for us who have recourse to thee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 868 | View Replies]

To: MarkBsnr

Very true.


878 posted on 01/08/2010 7:05:29 PM PST by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 875 | View Replies]

To: Quix

Some day, Quix, the Holy Spirit will drop on you like the mythical Calvinist leopard, and then we shall see, my brother. :)


879 posted on 01/08/2010 7:06:43 PM PST by MarkBsnr ( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 871 | View Replies]

To: Dr. North
Sans Jesu Christe, nulla salus est

Yup. No one is arguing otherwise.

880 posted on 01/08/2010 7:07:10 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 865 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 841-860861-880881-900 ... 12,201-12,204 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson