[Petronski]

If you want a non-sequitur, look at your previous post. Your logic seems to be that since Matthew recorded exactly what Christ said, Matthew means what you say it means.

Meanwhile we see more of the suspicious use of quotation marks. Just whom are you quoting there?

[wagglebee]

Meanwhile we see more of the suspicious use of quotation marks. Just whom are you quoting there?

Usually, on these threads, quotations marks are used to indicated an exact quote which can be found on THOUSANDS of OFFICIAL ROMAN CATHOLIC WEBSITES...just don't ask for a link to any of those sites.

[Dutchboy88]

"If you want a non-sequitur, look at your previous post. Your logic seems to be that since Matthew recorded exactly what Christ said, Matthew means what you say it means.

Takes a lot of time to continue to correct your misstatements about "logic". I simply said, that if Matthew recorded exactly what Christ said, then Christ meant exactly what Matthew recorded. And, He did not say, "And upon you I will build my church." He could have, but did not. That would have clearly meant Peter.

Instead, He used the feminine gendered petra, rather that petros. The Catholic Church has erred in making this into a Pope Peter, and we simply wish to correct the record. Well, that and call the Vatican to repent, if it can.