You are a hoot. Further your thesis that the Dogma was condemned before it was approved has been debunked by multiple posters.
What denomination are you?
Thank you.
Further your thesis that the Dogma was condemned before it was approved has been debunked by multiple poste
One "debunking" at a time, please. You said, "The cut-n-paste claimed proclamation of a Pope that was debunked." So did Pope Hormisdas reaffirm a phony decree or not? Why would Pope Nicolas authoritatively cite a phony decree and falsely attribute it to Pope Gelasius?
And "my thesis" is not that the Dogma was condemned before it was approved, but that the WRITING, IT"S AUTHORS, AND IT"S ADHERENTS, i.e., the Transitus writing of the Assumption of Mary, that theological redaction of ealier accounts, known to be the origin of this teaching into Church teaching via Gregory of Tours, was condemned before the teaching on the Assumption was eventually approved.
What denomination are you?
We' re not going to change the subject that fast. Answer my questions first; Did Pope Nicolas affirm a phony decree or not? Did Pope Nicolas authoritatively cite a phony decree and falsely attribute it to Pope Gelasius, or did he not?
Cordially,