Bojewyan, Trejewas, Hebrides, and Ebro to name a few.
There was a time in the early church Christianity got a foot hold. It held in England and the rest of Europe because of the Roman empire - that was not the case in India. But the report I cited to you states similar points as your (still to be located) quote by Tertullian. Not to hard to see the comparison if one bothers to read.
It held in England because that's where Jesus and Joseph went.
You probably have your sources all mixed up again. Cite the manuscript - links do work here. But if is referring to the latin - it only describes a military officer in the Roman infantry or cavalry OR member of a Roman city or town council. A member of the Sanhedren would not be either.
Why not?
Oh, cry me a river time. The problem is - show me a MS from the period that says so - not what is widely acknowledged as a myth/fiction nearly 1000 years later.
What about some of the Welsh manuscipts? Are you not aware of them?
Then I'm sure you can cite the specific councils. But wow, 1409 council of Pisa - really increases my confidence, how many years after the resurrection was that?.
Every piece of evidence you call a lie or a forgery. Even the Jewish Talmud descendency record.
First it falsifies the Person, Nature and Work of Jesus. Jesus didn't study under Druids (who would be the 'teachers' in England at that time). Right, God the Son learning from Druids.
Jesus certainly didn't study under anyone. He prepared the Jews working around the mines to accept Christianity right after the resurrection.
Secondly, it is false history, based upon myth and legend, used to fortify heretical teachings of anglo-israel groups, including WWCOG and splnter groups. Finally, the scriptures make it clear that Jesus began his ministry at the age of 30 - not before.
The preparations started much before that. What about His trip to Jerusalem when He was a child. When He spoke to the Rabbis He wasn't teaching?
What Joseph was and inferred to again is based upon unsubstantiated myth and legend originating in the middle ages - a thousand years or so after the resurrection.
No, there are Welsh sources long before that you apparently aren't aware of. Of course I'm sure they're just lies and forgeries.
So if ya want to believe the world is flat, go right ahead FRiend. However since you have so far been incapable of providing concrete evidence that JoA went to England, or any other portions of the immediate story - it remains that - an unsubstantiated myth.
It is a myth to anyone who won't consider any evidence anything other than lies and forgeries.
Kinda challenged I see in providing definitive information eh. So some adaptation of jewish names are present in some locations. Guess what - that is the same world wide. Does that put JoA and Jesus there in the first century - hardly since that is based upon myth (as are the sources of these names)
It held in England because that's where Jesus and Joseph went.
Because of Pax Roma, serious study of history would serve to correct many of these misconceptions.
The preparations started much before that. What about His trip to Jerusalem when He was a child. When He spoke to the Rabbis He wasn't teaching?
Ever heard of the term Bar Mitzvah? A child declared out of wedlock generally had to prove himself separately to the scribes and elders. He was discussing scripture - not tin mining practices in England.
No, there are Welsh sources long before that you apparently aren't aware of. Of course I'm sure they're just lies and forgeries.
Provide citations, authors, titles when written - but then you still have that Tertullian reference misplaced too.