Merry Christmas..
I was not looking to “argue” theology I just like things sourced if I am to believe they have validity.
I just know the RC church accepts all Christian baptisms as valid, so if there was a denominational mark tied to it they would be marked Methodist or presbyterian etc..
So I was looking to a source for that thought
Have a blessed holiday
“I was not looking to ‘argue’ theology I just like things sourced if I am to believe they have validity.”
Why would I try to demonstrate the “validity” of the teachings of the Church to you, in that you've already rejected those teachings? If you don't understand what the teachings mean, I'm willing to help clear up some of the confusion, but you've made clear many, many times that you reject them, so I'm uninterested in trying to demonstrate that you're wrong.
“I just know the RC church accepts all Christian baptisms as valid, so if there was a denominational mark tied to it they would be marked Methodist or presbyterian etc..”
I see here that the misunderstanding is deeper than I initially thought. Your post appears to rest on some premises that don't have much to do with what the Church believes and teaches about baptism.
Merry Christmas to you, too.
sitetest