No - that would be Mormonism. [Alex Murphy]
Beat me to it [Gamecock]
Not putting up basphemeous billboards about His mother and His birth...Mormonism teaches that god came down and had sex with Mary...But not Christianity... [Tennessee Nana]
It is clearly your opinion that Mormons are not Christian -- that's fine, you're entitled to that. Mormons believe that they *are* Christian. I believe that they are, too. As to how Mary became impregnated, how do you suppose it happened? I suppose it happened precisely the way the Bible said it did in Luke 1:35: "The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest shall overshadow thee: therefore also that holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God." Pretty straightforward, I should have thought, without being overly graphic. The Holy Ghost made Mary pregnant. *How* this happened, in graphic detail, is left to our fertile (and sometimes filthy) imaginations because it is unimportant. [DieHard the Hunter]
Well, if you want to know why Alex Murphy & Gamecock & TN said what they did, keep reading...you can see for yourselves what the Lds "prophets" & "apostles" have declared through the years.
This isn't the first time that the Mormons have been rather imposing shall we say as they superimpose their own version of the Mormon Mary upon a true Biblical vision of who she really is!
In fact, I would say that if someone showed the following to every ex-Catholic Mormon, or every Catholic being visited by a Mormon for proselytism purposes, they would sprint away from all LDS!
Example: Some LDS leaders have tried to play it both ways re: describing Mary as a virgin (for example, LDS apostle Bruce R. McConkie). Some clearly implied that she wasnt (Brigham Young)
Example of LDS saying Mary was a virgin: "Modernistic teachings denying the virgin birth are utterly and completely apostate and false." (Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, page 822. [A CARM writers comment to this was: Let them proclaim it. But quite honestly, I fail to see how the Mormon people can assert that Mary remained a virgin in light of this evidence from their prophets and apostles. I see them saying two different things and backpedaling trying to sound Christian.]
Lets deal with each of those descriptions separately, shall we?
Literal:
The birth of the Savior was a natural occurrence unattended with any degree of mysticism, and the Father God was the literal parent of Jesus in the flesh as well as in the spirit." (Lds "prophet" Joseph Fielding Smith, Religious Truths Defined, p. 44)
Christ was born into the world as the literal Son of this Holy Being; he was born in the same personal, real, and literal sense that any mortal son is born to a mortal father. There is nothing figurative about his paternity; he was begotten, conceived and born in the normal and natural course of events, for he is the Son of God, and that designation means what it says. (McConkie Mormon Doctrine, p. 742, 1966)
Did ya'll catch the conception part here being discussed as part of a normal and natural course of events process? Was McConkie just making that up out of thin air? No. He was simply repeating what earlier LDS prophets have said about this natural process:
...same physical sense that any other man begets a child...:
Brigham Young:
God created man [as spirit children], as we create our children: for there is no other process of creation in heaven, on the earth, in the earth, or under the earth, or in all eternities, that is, that were, or that ever will be. Journal of Discourses (JoD), vol. 11, p. 122
(OK, Young's quote here = absolute statement that God only has one means of creation, and that the spirit, Jesus, was first created in heaven through the same process as we create our children).
The birth of the Savior was as natural as are the births of our children; it was the result of natural action. He partook of flesh and bloodwas begotten of his Father, as we were of our fathers. (JoD vol. 8, p. 115)
(Of course, if any poster wants to tell us that they were begotten of their fathers in some other manner that their fathers who partook of flesh and blood--anything other than what Young called a natural action--weve got listening ears)
When the time came that His first-born, the Saviour, should come into the world and take a tabernacle, the Father came Himself and favoured that spirit with a tabernacle instead of letting any other man do it. (JoD, vol. 4, p. 218, 1857)
What was Brigham meaning? When the Virgin Mary conceived the child Jesus, the Father had begotten him in his own likeness. He was not begotten by the Holy Ghost. And who is the Father? He is the first of the human family; and when he took a tabernacle, it was begotten by his Father in heaven. (JoD vol. 1, p. 50, April 9, 1852)
What did Brigham mean by "who is the Father?...first of the human family?
Jesus, our elder brother, was begotten in the flesh by the same character that was in the garden of Eden, and who is our Father in Heaven. Now, let all who may hear these doctrines, pause before they make light of them, or treat them with indifference, for they will prove their salvation or damnation Now remember from this time forth, and for ever, that Jesus Christ was not begotten by the Holy Ghost. (Millennial Star, Vol. 15, p. 770, 1853)
What other LDS prophets embraced Brighams natural process of begottening?
As the horse, the ox, the sheep, and every living creature, including man, propogates its own species & perpetuates its own kind, so does God perpetuate His. (Lds "prophet" John Taylor, Mediation & Atonement, 1882, p. 165 )
What about other LDS apostles? What did they say about this natural process?
"In relation to the way in which I look upon the works of God and his creatures, I will say that I was naturally begotten; so was my father, and also my saviour Jesus Christ. According to the Scriptures, he is the first begotten of his father in the flesh, and there was nothing unnatural about it." (LDS apostle Heber C. Kimball, Journal of Discourses, v. 8, p. 211)
"Christ was begotten by an Immortal Father in the same way that mortal men are begotten by mortal fathers" (LDS apostle Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 1966, p. 547.)
Now Ive cited McConkie twice, and a lot of folks have seen one or both of those quotes, but not nearly as many have seen this following McConkie excerpt where McConkie makes sure we otherstand the literalness of whats he talking about:
We have spoke PLAINLY of our Lords conception in the womb of Mary. I am the son of my father and the father of my sons. They are my sons because they were begotten by me, were conceived by their mother, and came forth from her womb to breathe the breath of mortal life, to dwell for a time and a season among other mortal men. And so it is with the Eternal Father and the mortal birth of the Eternal Son. The Father is a Father is a Father
And the Son is a Son is a Son
a literal, living offspring from an actual Father. God is the Father; Christ is the Son. The one begat the other. Mary provided the womb from which the Spirit Jehovah came forth, tabernacled in clay, as all men are, to dwell among his fellow spirits whose births were brought to pass in like manner. There is no need to spiritualize away the plain meaning of the scriptures. There is nothing figurative or hidden or beyond comprehension in our Lords coming into mortality. He is the Son of God in the same sense and way that we are the sons of mortal fathers. It is that simple. Christ was born of Mary. He is the Son of Godthe Only Begotten of the Father. (McConkie, The Promised Messiah, pp. 467-468, 1978 )
Thanks for the ping, but I have no idea whatsoever why you included me.
If a few of these "choice Mormon quotes" were placed in countries & communities where the Lds has been heavily proselytizing within the Catholic community, the uproar would be significant.
It seems to me Brigham Young was stipulating that the manner/methods of human procreation are necessarily binding on how God procreates. I don't see any rational basis for this supposition. There is no equivalence between God and man. God cannot be "reduced" to human criteria. (Nor, it seems to me, can man be "elevated" to divine status.)
God is Life. God is Spirit. He is subject to no law; for He Is Law i.e., Truth (Logos).
To be preoccupied with the "hows" (on the crudest basis) of the divine Incarnation is to miss the point that this Incarnation is uniquely, utterly, absolutely, everlastingly Divine.
But once you realize that, then you understand God could have done it any way it pleased Him. The Holy Bible testifies that He did it in a particular way via the Holy Spirit. And moreover, that the virginity of Mary was in no way inpaired/compromised by this particular way.
And at that point, I for one recognize that human speculations in this regard are altogether pointless, futile.
Not to mention divisive.
But my own spirit rings to the Truth of what the Holy Scriptures say in this matter.