In the past, I've asked you not to post to me or ping me. You have mostly respected that request. Thank you.
I understand that it is your post that I'm discussing with the Religion Moderator, nonetheless, I only wanted to discuss the assertion made in your post with the Religion Moderator. I was interested in whether the Religion Moderator saw evidence of what you asserted.
I have never read any post of yours on the Religion Forum that seemed even remotely worthwhile in any way. In fact, just the opposite, your posts usually range from incoherent, wild, raving posts to truly vulgar and base offerings. As you know, some of your posts have been so crude as to require deletion by moderators. Thus, I have no general interest in discussing your posts with you, or anything else, for that matter.
For a long time, I'd appreciated the idiosyncratic things that you do with your posts - lots of colors, different fonts and font sizes - as it had alerted me that I may safely pass a post without losing anything of any value whatsoever in any way, shape or form. If you could return to the style, I would be much obliged.
All that being said, if you vowed that your posts would avoid incoherent anti-Catholic and anti-Christian ranting, I would consider discussing your original assertion with you in the post of yours that I cited.
sitetest
Evidently we don’t share enough common experience or vocabulary to have a meaningful discussion.
However, your post does trigger the following . . .
1. Evidently the “Dear” in “Dear Quix”
was a mistake, an error, a fraud or a lie.
2. I wonder which “Saint” you’d credit with funneling such sweetness to you for sharing with me.
3. What attractive aspect of Roman Catholicism were you displaying in that post?