Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Quix

Thank you for your support, however I must hasten to point out that you might have just pinged a lot of non-Charismatics to this caucus.


28 posted on 12/07/2009 8:25:27 AM PST by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: Religion Moderator
Dear Religion Moderator,

“Folks trying to rabidly find loop-holes in your criteria that will allow them to disrupt and soil the nest of a Charismatic caucus seem to have a foolishly low estimate of your alertness and comprehensive understanding.”

I hadn't seen too much of this (actually, I hadn't seen this at all). I saw folks looking for clarification of just what the nature of this caucus might be (so, there were requests to remove “catholic” and similar keywords to avoid confusion - hardly the work of loophole finders). I saw some folks asking about the fact that this label crosses many theological boundaries. Is this “loophole finding” on the part of folks “rabidly” trying to disrupt this caucus?

May I ask you who might be such a poster, “rabidly finding loop-holes...” etc.?


sitetest

31 posted on 12/07/2009 8:35:37 AM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

To: Religion Moderator

Hmmmmm . . .

I suppose I should check. That was my small sounding board group from the END TIMES list . . . my understanding is that they would all qualify as Charismatics. However, I’ll poll them to be sure. Sorry.


33 posted on 12/07/2009 9:02:44 AM PST by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 TRAITORS http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson