Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: topcat54

I actually make no argument regarding the kingdom with that verse, merely the fact that it is stated that the Lord’s judgment is coincident with his appearance.

And I find it so amusing that I was called self deluded for making use of the KJV (which I didn’t). Perhaps it is the dispensationalists who are self deluded for ignoring the clear reading of that verse. I also find it knee slapping amusing that the verse is followed by the warning that people will turn away from listening to the truth and wander after MYTHS. Kinda describes dispensationalism, don’t it.


171 posted on 11/19/2009 5:33:53 PM PST by Lord_Calvinus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies ]


To: Lord_Calvinus
I actually make no argument regarding the kingdom with that verse, merely the fact that it is stated that the Lord’s judgment is coincident with his appearance.

I understand. But some folks wish to take a simple verse and insert their fantasy millennial kingdom without any justification, and ignore other passages that makes such a view impossible.

174 posted on 11/20/2009 7:09:36 AM PST by topcat54 ("Don't whine to me. It's all Darby's fault.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson