Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: annalex
Right. That is what I am saying. Such prince would be an usurper without authority

No, they would never have been pirnces. Why would God give authority to usurpers? According to +Paul, all authorty is from God; none is from the devil.

83 posted on 11/16/2009 7:50:39 PM PST by kosta50 (Don't look up, the truth is all around you)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]


To: kosta50

Usurpers of power do not have any authority. They have force, but not authority. If they attempt to legislate, they are to be disobeyed, because, per Romans 13, they act without authority.

I would give some legitimacy to inherited authority, that is if “prince” is to be taken literally. But still, a (literal) prince might have inherited certain property rights, but he does not have authority to legislate against divine principles of justice.


85 posted on 11/16/2009 8:07:21 PM PST by annalex (http://www.catecheticsonline.com/CatenaAurea.php)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson