[DouglasKC]

3.His ideas about the information inside the cell 3. Make up a claim, attribute it to Darwin, prove claim wrong. All in a days work for a lying creationist

Nonsense. The article clearly detailed Darwin's theory of pangenesis.

From wiki:

"Pangenesis itself is now seen as deeply flawed and not supported by observation, yet it represents Darwin's attempt to explain such diverse phenomena as:"

So again, Darwin was wrong from the get go in his theory about how information was carried and transmitted in cells.

[Ira_Louvin]

And you are completely ignoring over a 150 years of scientific advancement since Dawrin.

So how does this support a 6 day creation, 6,000 years ago?