You are entitled to your interpretation, but don't get too frustrated if no body takes you seriously. You repeatedly state that Darwin's own words do not have significant or credibility because you some how have a greater understanding of his thoughts and beliefs based upon reflections by those born nearly a century after his death. This twisting and manipulation of fact long after the actual events is not unlike the way that the likes of John Wycliffe and John Calvin took the Word of God and bent it to their own purposed. You fit in well with your chosen church. Since I am not one of them please, for the last time, do not trouble me with your errant postulations again.
Of course you could start a Darwin worship caucus if such is allowable here but until then I'll comment where and what I wish without your imprimatur, thank you.