Because I have learned, in over a decade of FReeping, the "spelling cop" is wiser in his own eyes than seven men that can give a discreet answer...
For example: your definition of "heresy" above is as ludicrous and self-negating as the statement "there are no absolutes," but demonstrating that fact for you would be "teaching a pig to sing" so I'll keep my pearls to myself despite your numerous fatuities after post #200.
That's about as lame as it gets...
For example: your definition of "heresy" above is as ludicrous and self-negating as the statement "there are no absolutes,"
My definition of heresy is correct: teaching that which is contrary to the teaching of the Church. The only thing that is ridiculous is your negation of it.
but demonstrating that fact for you would be "teaching a pig to sing" so I'll keep my pearls to myself despite your numerous fatuities after post #200
So instead of substance you have to resort to insults (never even attempting to answer or document any of your answers), I suppose in hopes that you will bait me to respond in kind. I won't stoop down to your level. In fact, I couldn't even if I wanted to.
Your replies are void of any substance, or meaning. You fail to answer straightforward questions such as why do you persistently write Greek with a lower-case letter g, or how many languages do you know expertly. You don't reply to historical facts with historical facts but with out-of-context fables. You claim that you studied Greek, yet you are unfamiliar with variant transliterationsal forms of the same. You use well known words in a supposedly colloquial manner when such colloquial usage is not documented in dictionaries. You insinuate that I said apostasy is dependent on geography, yet you will not provide where I supposedly make such a claim. In short, you don't answer anything. You just spill out your vomit and insults for whatever reason once a week. That's pathetic.