“The proof for the claim is lacking, and the proof against the claim is considerable.”
This is pure B.S. You have gall. I know of no historical artifact for which evidence of the sort that exists for the Shroud. The evidence adds up to proof insofar as any historical artifact’s authenticity can be proven.
The proof against the claim is laughable.
And that you don’t know this proves beyond any doubt that you have not read the evidence on either side.
You simply are BSing your way through this.
“You simply are BSing your way through this.”
Yup, cuz he don’t like them relics and them thar Papists!