(sorry, catching up the thread)
I have grown weary (and leery) of replacement theology. The more I studied the Word, the less sense it made.
What really bothered me was the blessings laid upon the 12 tribes in Gen 49 - A non-negotiable prophetic event regarding the last days... If those tribes (all of them) are not present and accounted for in some way, then that prophecy is null, and Moses' books are null, which books are the foundation of all. If the foundation cannot be trusted, then none of The Book is good.
Replacement theology does not account for Gen 49. It cannot be right, or the Bible cannot be right. I will stand on the Word of God.
What really bothered me was the blessings laid upon the 12 tribes in Gen 49 - A non-negotiable prophetic event regarding the last days... If those tribes (all of them) are not present and accounted for in some way, then that prophecy is null, and Moses’ books are null, which books are the foundation of all. If the foundation cannot be trusted, then none of The Book is good.
Replacement theology does not account for Gen 49. It cannot be right, or the Bible cannot be right. I will stand on the Word of God.
################
INDEED. AN EXCEEDINGLY EXCELLENT POINT.
Of course, Excellent points somehow manage to avoid scratching the granite surfaces of the clueless ones . . . but what else is new!?!