Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Quix; topcat54

OK. I think (on this point) that I’ll have to agree. I don’t think the 200 million are actual horsemen. Not sure what they are yet, but my thinking is that the term “200 million horsemen” is merely “one really huge army” that would normally be unbeatable.


251 posted on 09/16/2009 6:39:40 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 250 | View Replies ]


To: ShadowAce

I still disagree.

I’d love to know, though, what the variety of ways of stating large numbers were at that time in that culture and language.

It MIGHT possibly be that the way it’s stated in the text is an emphasis denoting God’s point about the specific number.

Regardless, I to NOT think God had a problem choosing between

A VERY LARGE ARMY vs 200 MILLION.

I have found HIS WORDING IN SCRIPTURE TO BE EXTREMELY PRECISE. When He wanted to be fuzzy, He was fuzzy. When He didn’t want to be fuzzy, He wasn’t.


253 posted on 09/16/2009 8:09:26 AM PDT by Quix (POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

To: ShadowAce
OK. I think (on this point) that I’ll have to agree. I don’t think the 200 million are actual horsemen. Not sure what they are yet, but my thinking is that the term “200 million horsemen” is merely “one really huge army” that would normally be unbeatable.

So, have you just opened the entire book of Revelation up to a subjectivist interpretation?

272 posted on 09/18/2009 9:57:25 AM PDT by topcat54 ("If Israel is 'God's prophetic clock,' then dispensationalists do not know how to tell time.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 251 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson