[Outership]

I haven’t forgotten that I presented a fully fleshed out interpretation of Biblical prophesies.

It can be seen here: http://tiny.cc/rPSQc

You, however, have yet to reveal what *your* interpretation of the Biblical prophesies is. The truth is, you have none, you simply like to be contrary and you get a thrill from disrupting people who are talking about the Bible.

You say Biblical prophesy was fulfilled in 70AD. OK then, why don’t you tell the thread who or what you believe Wormwood was in 70AD.

[Lee N. Field]

I haven’t forgotten that I presented a fully fleshed out interpretation of Biblical prophesies.

It can be seen here: http://tiny.cc/rPSQc

So, is that your presentation? Are you "Donald Koenig"?

[Quix]

THANKS FOR THE LINK to that impressive presentation of Biblical prophecies.

I wouldn’t hold out for a comparable presentation by the other side.

Oh, they don’t lack for idiot piles of stinking words ad nauseum. However, they are grossly lacking in Biblical congruence—the UNRubberized Biblical congruence, for sure.

And, they are lacking in logical consistency by a trillion galactic clusters. . . . wellll maybe half a trillion.

And the authors virtually to a man, are dreadfully boring and full of themselves.

They read like their philosophical/theological progenitors . . . the so called ‘higher’ criticism clique of pseudo “Biblical” “Scholars” of a hundre years or so ago.

It’s shocking that Conservative Christian FREEPERS would touch such trash with a 100’ pole.

That they seem so glibly oblivious to their dragging unwitting young and potential believer lurkers into hell with such trash is beyond shocking.

[topcat54]

I haven’t forgotten that I presented a fully fleshed out interpretation of Biblical prophesies.

Your Outership,

You did not present anything. You gave us a link to commentary by someone who is not here to defend his outrageously wrongheaded interpretations. (Which you can read about here and here.)

You have the perfect opportunity to back up you own ideas with your own words and interpretation of Scripture. I can't understand the reluctance to rely entirely on someone else to do your thinking.

If you are afraid of having your ideas honestly critiqued, I suggest you should not have sounded off in the first place, and then try to divert attention away by claiming I’m not responsive. You’re already wrapped abound the “Wormwood” axle for whatever reason, and, as I said, I’m perfectly happy and prepared to answer your questions directly WHEN you come forth with your own ideas in your own words.

But I’m still ready to dialogue (with you, not Mr. Koenig, unless he wants to signup for FR).