Here's the faulty, strung-together "logic" as I understood it when this was posted last July:
1) Give Luke 10 verse about Lucifer being cast out of heaven ["as lightning falling from the heavens"].
2) Make the unsupported assertion that Jesus' words recorded were actually spoken in Aramaic.
3) Make the unsupported assertion that Aramaic is really Hebrew
4) Provide the Hebrew (not Aramaic, not Greek) pronunciation of one word out of the sentence (lightning).
5) Move to Isaiah 14 verse about Lucifer aspiring to reign in heaven ["ascend above the heights of the clouds"].
6) Provide the Hebrew pronunciation for one word out of the sentence (heights)
7) Provide the Hebrew pronunciation for a grammar conjunction, but without offering a reason/cause (note: conjunction not found or used in previous two verses)
8) String together the Hebrew word from the first verse, the unused conjunction, and the Hebrew word from the second verse.
9) Justify the strung-together phrase by claiming it's how a modern day Rabbi (not an OT or a NT rabbi) would read Luke 10 in Hebrew.
[... faulty, strung-together “logic” ...]
This “logic” gives me a “stringy” headache!