In other words, your anti-Darwinism isn't based on a defense of the Word of G-d at all but on philosophy. Again, my generalization of Catholics and other liturgical chr*stians holds good.
I wonder how many people believe J*sus was conceived without a father and came out of his mother's side in order to prevent tearing her hymen? For some reason that seems terribly important to people who don't care whether or not the Word spoken by G-d is absolutely true.
The Bible tells us again and again that it is about the relationship between God and man. Darwinism denies the meaningfulness of that relation. A theory of evolution does not require this, only one that incorporates a mechanistic philosophy.
You obviously didn't understand my post AT ALL.
Again, my generalization of Catholics and other liturgical chr*stians holds good.
I'm not all that interested in your generalizations, generalizations are typically cop-outs.
For the record, I do believe in Creation as it is written in the Bible.
I wonder how many people believe J*sus was conceived without a father and came out of his mother's side in order to prevent tearing her hymen? For some reason that seems terribly important to people who don't care whether or not the Word spoken by G-d is absolutely true.
Perhaps you should ask them, I've read every post on this thread and haven't seen that expressed by anyone.