To: Judith Anne; netmilsmom; wagglebee; Iscool; Quix
You keep posting that photograph, with no location or verification I posted the location. And I accept the verification offered at the site.
No amount of proof would satisfy those who are determined to deny the meaning of the clear and foul words of the RCC catechism, its popes and its saints.
If I posted an 8 x 10 glossy of that cross on the front door of the basilica in Rome some Roman Catholics would just as quickly say it was "photoshopped."
As I said, after hearing RCs defend Ratzinger's "global authority," we now know RCs can stonewall, deny, defend just about anything...
SCRIPTURE: "For there is one God and one mediator between God and men..."
RCC: "No, there are lots of 'em."
I accept the verification of that photo. You don't. I'm not surprised.
635 posted on
10/20/2009 9:10:34 AM PDT by
Dr. Eckleburg
("I don't think they want my respect; I think they want my submission." - Flemming Rose)
To: Dr. Eckleburg; Judith Anne; netmilsmom
I posted the location. And I accept the verification offered at the site. Do you also accept what that site says about Calvinists, Evangelicals and Southern Baptists? Or do you only accept what they say about the Catholic Church?
I accept the verification of that photo. You don't. I'm not surprised.
I posted several VERIFIABLE photos (i.e. they can be viewed on multiple websites) of the basilica in question. It is one of the oldest and most visited churches in Rome. NOTHING in any photo even comes close to resembling the picture you posted.
637 posted on
10/20/2009 9:15:27 AM PDT by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
SCRIPTURE: "For there is one God and one mediator between God and men..."So then you never ask anyone to pray for you, right?
638 posted on
10/20/2009 9:16:57 AM PDT by
Petronski
(In Germany they came first for the Communists, And I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist...)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
The ball is in your court too.
WHERE is the “Main Mary Basilica in Rome”?
Show us. You didn’t post a location, you posted gibberish.
Anyone taking a picture to prove a point would at least have a real name of a particular church.
Unless they want to hide the fact that this is not real.
640 posted on
10/20/2009 9:20:01 AM PDT by
netmilsmom
(Psalm 109:8 - Let his days be few; and let another take his office)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
No amount of proof would satisfy those who are determined to deny the meaning of the clear and foul words of the RCC catechism, its popes and its saints.
If I posted an 8 x 10 glossy of that cross on the front door of the basilica in Rome some Roman Catholics would just as quickly say it was “photoshopped.”
As I said, after hearing RCs defend Ratzinger’s “global authority,” we now know RCs can stonewall, deny, defend just about anything...
#########################
INDEED.
The truth of your assertions is abundantly displayed on any thread that . . . particularly the rabid RC cliques decide to trash out of their terminal insecurities over things different than their constructions on reality.
Amazing.
650 posted on
10/20/2009 9:29:53 AM PDT by
Quix
(POL Ldrs quotes fm1900 2 presnt: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/religion/2130557/posts?page=81#81)
To: Dr. Eckleburg
***I accept the verification of that photo. You don’t. I’m not surprised. ***
I’m not either. On what grounds do accept the verification of this photo?
***If I posted an 8 x 10 glossy of that cross on the front door of the basilica in Rome some Roman Catholics would just as quickly say it was “photoshopped.” ***
The point is that you haven’t and would not unless it were photoshopped. This picture is not Catholic and saying that it is does not make it so unless you have proof. More proof than the Reformed are used to, anyway.
780 posted on
10/20/2009 5:56:38 PM PDT by
MarkBsnr
( I would not believe in the Gospel if the authority of the Catholic Church did not move me to do so.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson