Mary's co-operation in the Redemption.
The title Corredemptrix= Coredemptress, which has been current since the fifteenth century, and which also appears in some official Church documents under Pius X (and other Popes) must not be conceived in the sense of an equation of the efficacy of Mary with the redemptive activity of Christ, the sole Redeemer of humanity (1 Tim. 2, s).
As she herself required redemption and in fact was redeemed by Christ, she could not of herself merit the grace of the redemption of humanity Her co-operation in the objective redemption is an indirect, remote cooperation and derives from this that she voluntarily devoted her whole life to the service of the Redeemer, and, under the Cross, suffered and sacrificed with Him.
As Pope Pius XII says in the Encyclical “Mystici Corporis" (1943): She offered Him on Golgotha to the Eternal Father together with the holocaust of her maternal rights and her motherly love like a new Eve for all children of Adam As "The New Eve" she is, as the same Pope declares, in the Constitution" Muniticentissimus Deus" (1950), “the sublime associate of the Redeemer”.
Yes, Rome talks out of both sides of its mouth, as we’ve just seen. So was John Paul II wrong?
What a bunch of poppycock...Your pope is wrong, again...
Mary did not offer her son Jesus to the FATHER for anything...
GOD OFFERED THE SON (FOR US)...
together with the holocaust of her maternal rights and her motherly love like a new Eve for all children of Adam As "The New Eve"
What kind of gibberish is that??? The holocaust of her maternal rights??? A new Eve???