[Godzilla]

Trouble is, they construe that as ALREADY HAVING TAKEN PLACE circ 70 A.D. I know . . . such a notion is utterly UNBiblical and hysterically laughable. However, like taste, there’s no accounting for REPLACEMENTARIAN PSEUDO-THEOLOGY.

In addition to all your other comments, it is clear that they are the one's who are letting their theology color their scripture interpretation and not the other way around.

[Quix]

That’s certainly been my observation.

So far, I can think of no other more apt short-hand description than . . .

RUBBER BIBLE’D PSEUDO-THEOLOGY.

It sure doesn’t seem to have much to do with the Bible I now.