That is not an ad hominem. The fundamental problem is that dispensationalists cannot grasp that non-dispenationalists do not come to the text with dispensational presuppositions. Likewise, because of your presuppositions, you cannot imagine a more valid interpretation of the text. How is that ad hominem?
It’s one of the
uhhhh
REPLACEMENTARIAN DOCTRINAL RULES on such threads.
SOP—Standard Operating Procedure from the first such thread I’d ever participated in a decade or so ago, hereon.
I don’t know why. I’m happy to be charitable toward all . . . even REPLACEMENTARIANS . . . and engage in warm friendly dialogue.
However, from the beginning, it was not to be. The derisive personal assaults seemed to be the order of the day and the only language they seem to know how to speak towards some of us. It’s distasteful . . . yet on occasion . . . adds a certain kind of energy or intensity to the threads.
And to the degree that makes solid Biblical content more memorable by the lurkers, I’m somewhat game.