[Desdemona]

How can an encyclical that seeks to point out that worldly affairs devoid of any ethical or moral consideration works against the common good be linked to endorsing a new world order when the very argument in the encyclical itself is that the current redistribution system denies the dignity of man? This is a treatise that warns against greed of all sorts -money, power, prestige, lack of commitment. I wonder why more is read into it.

The very sad thing, IMO, is that politics is read into everything that comes from the Vatican when this is more anti-political than not.

[Quix]

It’s a well known Neuro Linguistic Programming strategy to . . . note something . . . even highlight it in a certain way . . . as a way of neutralizing it.

This document COULD have a number of sentences fitting that strategy quite well. I’ll feel more confident of that after I’ve read the full version. What I’ve read so far is not comforting.

Let me put it this way . . . talking out of both sides of one’s fingers has long been a skillful way for tyranny to advance. Hitler was an artist at it. The NWO is, too.