Iscool:
First, off, I have not posted a comment to you in a year and don’t care to encourage your diatribes. You jump in every Catholic post and you clearly have your own anti-Catholic agenda. Further, if I remember correctly, your views of Christology, are defacto heretical in that your views mirror the heretic Nestorious, whose doctrines where rejected at the Council of Ephesus in 431 AD.
Second, “Nope” according to you, and I have already been on this board to know that you believe in Sola Meo. I stand by my post as again, Paul, Peter, James, John, etc, were all Apostles and part of the One Church, not each setting up there own churches apart from each other.
I will stand with the Fathers of the Church, the same ones who debated the canon of the Scripture and settled the canon, and their interpretations, rather than your “own personal interpretation.” No Church Father of the post-apostolic Church ever interpreted the disputes recorded in Acts 15 and Galatians 1 has a rejection of Peter being first among the apostles, or his being an Apostle. It is only those extremely anti Catholic Protestants, who want to make it say what they want it to say, in order to confirm there rejection of the Primacy of Rome and Peter’s authority given to St. Peter by Christ, which St. Paul could not, nor would he want to, undue and reject.
I have no concern what your religions councils or fathers want the verses to say or twist them to say...My concern is what they actually do say...
Gal 2:15 We who are Jews by nature, and not sinners of the Gentiles,
Gal 2:16 Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law, but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ, and not by the works of the law: for by the works of the law shall no flesh be justified.
Gal 2:21 I do not frustrate the grace of God: for if righteousness come by the law, then Christ is dead in vain.
There is the rebuke from Paul...It's clearly a doctrinal issue...It has to do with justification by works of the law as opposed to justification by faith...
I stand by my post as again, Paul, Peter, James, John, etc, were all Apostles and part of the One Church, not each setting up there own churches apart from each other.
Well of course they were (albeit the one church is not the Catholic church)...That what the dispute was over...Peter was slipping back into the circumcision thing teaching a false doctrine which was of course against the doctrine of the gospel of Grace...Paul rebuked him and pulled him back into the group...