[Iscool]

I hope you do not believe Arius was correct in his belief that the Son was created. Do you? Of course not. So let me emphasize again: Arius presumably "compared Scripture with Scripture," but nonetheless arrived at an erroneous conclusion. If this was true for Arius, what guarantee do you, or does ANY Protestant have, that this is not also true for your (their) interpretation of a given Bible passage? If you know for certain that Arius' interpretations were heretical, this implies that an objectively true or "right" interpretation exists for the Biblical passages he used.

No matter how far off Arius may have been, he wouldn't have been within miles of your religion's private and error laden interpretations of scripture...

[bdeaner]

No matter how far off Arius may have been, he wouldn't have been within miles of your religion's private and error laden interpretations of scripture...

All talk, no substance. Pfft.