I didn’t realize that I had a technique. But the difference is, is that Buddha wouldn’t be there when you got there anyway.
Besides, what’s wrong with being dogmatic?
Would you rather that a witness be spineless and
be blown about by every wind of doctrine?
How do you know that?
Besides, what’s wrong with being dogmatic?
It basically says "it's true because I say it is."
Would you rather that a witness be spineless and be blown about by every wind of doctrine?
No, all you need is compelling evidence. Don't believe me when I say don't touch the hot stove top? Okay. Go ahead and touch it then!
Now where is your compelling evidence? A book? I got dozens of books for you.