Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: bdeaner
It wasn't a strawman; it was reductio ad absurdum...;) That 4 years of Latin at Bishop O'Dea high school comes in handy sometimes!

But to answer the question, can a person can be a Protestant, not partake in communion, and not recognize the papacy's claim of apostolic succession and still be saved?

1,392 posted on 07/01/2009 6:56:00 PM PDT by PugetSoundSoldier (Indignation over the sting of truth is the defense of the indefensible)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1388 | View Replies ]


To: PugetSoundSoldier
But to answer the question, can a person can be a Protestant, not partake in communion, and not recognize the papacy's claim of apostolic succession and still be saved?

Reading comprehension, my friend ;) Read the article. YES. YES, if they truly believe that they are following Christ by doing so, how could the Lord refuse them? But for willfully rejecting a Truth, I think,--e.g. total unwillingness to listen to reason out of pride, for example-- there has to be at least temporal punishment for that, if not eternal damnation (purgation on earth or in the hereafter, as the case may be; that is, there are natural consequences for following error rather than Truth).

This is all in the article. This is the unfolding of the Deposit of Faith revealed in Vatican II. Many "conservative" Catholics left the Church and became schismatics as a result of this doctrine. But is it infallible doctrine.
1,408 posted on 07/01/2009 7:24:29 PM PDT by bdeaner (The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1392 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson