Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: bdeaner

If you want the discussion to be ecumenical (no antagonism allowed) then you must add the tag “[Ecumenical]” to the title.


1,211 posted on 07/01/2009 9:26:03 AM PDT by Religion Moderator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1208 | View Replies ]


To: Religion Moderator
If you want the discussion to be ecumenical (no antagonism allowed) then you must add the tag “[Ecumenical]” to the title.

I understand. By "ecumenical," I am talking about dialogue, and genuine dialogue, it seems to me, requires some antagonism, otherwise we are just playing nice. So, I don't mind the antagonism, and think that is all well and good. My only objection is to those who respond in a knee-jerk way to the title of the article without reading what in fact the article has to say. In retrospect, I would have put another tag in the title, such as "Please read article before jumping to conclusions."

In any case, thanks for the clarificaiton. I think the thread has been, and continues to be very productive and enriching in many cases -- albeit with some juvenile back-and-forth, but that is par for the course.
1,213 posted on 07/01/2009 9:43:42 AM PDT by bdeaner (The bread which we break, is it not a participation in the body of Christ? (1 Cor. 10:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1211 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson