Replies

Quix commentary continued. Am feeling a bit peek-ed so not sure how much will get done.

46. Anxious appeals for help have already been voiced. That of Our predecessor John XXIII was warmly received. (49) We reiterated his sentiments in Our Christmas message of 1963, (50) and again in 1966 on behalf of India. (51) The work of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has been encouraged by the Holy See and has found generous support. Our own organization, Caritas Internationalis, is at work all over the world. Many Catholics, at the urging of Our brother bishops, have contributed unstintingly to the assistance of the needy and have gradually widened the circle of those they call neighbors.

.

The United Nations orgs are ipso facto globalist from their foundation and in all their goals. The humanitarian stuff is . . . tricky and problematic when discussing such things.

Is humanitarian aid GOOD? Of course. So, isn’t FAO of the UN good? Not necessarily and entirely. Mostly it’s always good to feed the hungry and the starving etc. Development projects are even better.

However, the UN in all its operations is inserting itself into the lives of millions around the world as THE ORGANIZATION to depend on, to go to, eventually, to rule. In some key respects, it’s another case of the seductive beautiful face of evil.

I’m glad the Vatican has it’s own aid organization. And, it’s hard to fault the Pope for cooperating with UN aid organizations. Nevertheless . . . dancing with the devil at all is hazardous and costly regardless of when the fiddler is paid.

A World of Free Men

47. But these efforts, as well as public and private allocations of gifts, loans and investments, are not enough. It is not just a question of eliminating hunger and reducing poverty. It is not just a question of fighting wretched conditions, though this is an urgent and necessary task. It involves building a human community where men can live truly human lives, free from discrimination on account of race, religion or nationality, free from servitude to other men or to natural forces which they cannot yet control satisfactorily. It involves building a human community where liberty is not an idle word, where the needy Lazarus can sit down with the rich man at the same banquet table. (52)

.

SOUNDS wonderful. However, it’s more or less similar to the globalist GEORGIA GUIDESTONES Ten Commandments ref’d above. The globalists have a plan to solve those issues . . . and it is tyranny and depopulation wholesale. Their main route to decreasing hunger is to murder the population down to 200 million, globally.

They COULD use exotic technologies that they have kept under wraps for most of 60 years, to make the deserts of Australia bloom at negligible cost. Ditto the Middle Eastern deserts and the South American deserts and the Chinese and Central Asian deserts. The oligarchy could solve those issues magnanimously and wonderously.

However, their BOSS is not into such good things. Their BOSS is into DEATH, DESTRUCTION, CHAOS, CRUELTY.

On the part of the rich man, it calls for great generosity, willing sacrifice and diligent effort. Each man must examine his conscience, which sounds a new call in our present times. Is he prepared to support, at his own expense, projects and undertakings designed to help the needy? Is he prepared to pay higher taxes so that public authorities may expand their efforts in the work of development? Is he prepared to pay more for imported goods, so that the foreign producer may make a fairer profit? Is he prepared to emigrate from his homeland if necessary and if he is young, in order to help the emerging nations?

.

Sort of reads like an early OThuga/ Shrillery script.

The Believers in the Church of Christ have typically failed more than they should have by a long shot—to rectify what could have been rectified with sufficient Christians acting like Christians vs greedy consumers. And, voluntary good deeds have been lacking more than Christ would have had us do. Yet, if they are not voluntary, they are governmental and tyrannical. That’s not the answer.

A National Duty

48. The duty of promoting human solidarity also falls upon the shoulders of nations: "It is a very important duty of the advanced nations to help the developing nations . . ." (53) This conciliar teaching must be implemented. While it is proper that a nation be the first to enjoy the God-given fruits of its own labor, no nation may dare to hoard its riches for its own use alone. Each and every nation must produce more and better goods and products, so that all its citizens may live truly human lives and so that it may contribute to the common development of the human race.
Considering the mounting indigence of less developed countries, it is only fitting that a prosperous nation set aside some of the goods it has produced in order to alleviate their needs; and that it train educators, engineers, technicians and scholars who will contribute their knowledge and their skill to these less fortunate countries.

.

Yes, that’s the CHRISTIAN THING TO DO.

However, globalism mandating it by force at the basis of the lowest common denominator is tyrannical from hell. Enslaving the whole planet more tightly with bleaker options is not the answer.

Superfluous Wealth

49. We must repeat that the superfluous goods of wealthier nations ought to be placed at the disposal of poorer nations. The rule, by virtue of which in times past those nearest us were to be helped in time of need, applies today to all the needy throughout the world. And the prospering peoples will be the first to benefit from this.

.

This is sounding increasingly like a mandated fiat from globalist headquarters.

[Qx added paragraphing here]

Continuing avarice on their part will arouse the judgment of God and the wrath of the poor, with consequences no one can foresee. If prosperous nations continue to be jealous of their own advantage alone, they will jeopardize their highest values, sacrificing the pursuit of excellence to the acquisition of possessions. We might well apply to them the parable of the rich man. His fields yielded an abundant harvest and he did not know where to store it: "But God said to him, 'Fool, this very night your soul will be demanded from you . . .' " (54)

.

QUITE SO. I thoroughly agree. However, above, GOD IS THE ULTIMATE AUTHORITY, not globalism.

Concerted Planning

50. If these efforts are to be successful, they cannot be disparate and disorganized; nor should they vie with one another for the sake of power or prestige. The times call for coordinated planning of projects and programs, which are much more effective than occasional efforts promoted by individual goodwill.

.

OH, DEAR. There we have it. Centralized planning on a globalist scale. And so innocently put by such an innocent spokesperson. Very skillfully done. What a globalist achievement. And there’s nothing, really, to fault—on the surface.

Except that the whole plan is from the pit of hell.

As We said above, studies must be made, goals must be defined, methods and means must be chosen, and the work of select men must be coordinated; only then will present needs be met and future demands anticipated. Moreover, such planned programs do more than promote economic and social progress. They give force and meaning to the work undertaken, put due order into human life, and thus enhance man's dignity and his capabilities.

.

UHHHHH, NO! They do NOT enhance man’s dignity. They enslave him all the more tightly. Chips in his body to monitor his comings and goings and even his health . . . to more finely decide when he becomes a useless eater to be wiped off the planet speedily and totally.

The Pope must have known that there were even back then—already at least 67 years of planning toward such tyrannical ends. He must have known.

To be continued bit by bit.