Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Old Mountain man
So, are you saying that "offense" is acceptable, but "harm" is not?

Some folks here seem to think that being offended by the posts of the Inmans that are posted in rebuttal to mormon theology and practice is a major crime, although the posting of this information can in no way be described as "harmful" to any living human.

Perhaps walking in the offended shoes of those folks whose dead non-mormon relatives are highjacked would be a good experience for the ones offended by "anti" mormon posts.

12 posted on 05/09/2009 2:26:06 PM PDT by greyfoxx39 (Obama....never saw a Bush molehill he couldn't make a mountain out of.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: greyfoxx39

“Perhaps walking in the offended shoes of those folks whose dead non-mormon relatives are highjacked would be a good experience for the ones offended by “anti” mormon posts.”

Say what?

If I don’t believe in a religion and don’t believe in it’s practices then what it does over some old bones can not “Offend” or “harm” me or mine.

Cast all the spells they want but it don’t mean squat to me.

I put it in the same category as some Cajon Queen making a vodoo doll of me and sticking it with pins.

Ouch, my backs hurting - just kidding.


16 posted on 05/09/2009 2:44:17 PM PDT by PeteB570 (NRA - Life member and Black Rifle owner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson