Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl
The definition of life I provided is also not limited to biological life on this earth and has nothing at all to do with what life looks like, but everything to do with the types of energetic reactions that are required for there to be life.

Extraterrestrial life, if there is any, would need to be organized and to consume energy to maintain and replicate that organization.

The organization part has something to do with what the life form will look like, but I didn't specify a particular type of organization (a fur bearing tetrapod) which would make it have anything at all with what life looks like.

The definition provided has everything to do with what reactions are necessary and sufficient for there to be life.

985 posted on 06/26/2009 1:53:26 PM PDT by allmendream ("Wealth is EARNED not distributed, so how could it be redistributed?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 984 | View Replies ]


To: allmendream; betty boop; TXnMA
I strongly disagree of course that your definition of life is suitable for all kinds of life we might encounter, e.g. life which neither metabolizes nor replicates.

But beyond that, I'm putting your and my definition on the back burner. I just received a book today from betty boop - thank you, dearest sister in Christ - and just by a quick scan of the content I suspect your definition is the "straight man" for what she and Robert Rosen have to say on the subject.

1,022 posted on 06/27/2009 10:34:57 PM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 985 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson