Of course, but we are talking about two different definitions of predictions. The hallmark of science is that observations are replicable. That is if it is observed that the earth is spinning, then sunrise times are predictable. F=MA means that the trajectory of a bullet is predictable. These are all predictions based on observations of what is.
Religion on the other hand uses the term prediction and prophecy synonymously. These 'predictions' are not replicable and may not even be observable.
We are using terms that don't mean the same thing between the scientific and religious uses of the words.
Prophecy is MUCH more vague, something along the lines of “Sometime in the future, after event A, event B will happen” with both A and B being rather vague.
Science is predictive not just on things that have already been observed, but also allows one to hypothesize the existence of factors that have NOT been observed.
Observation tells me that the Sun will come up where I am sometime around 6 am local time. That observation is not dependent upon me having any understanding of gravity.
An understanding of gravity however will allow me to predict the orbital velocity of a hypothetical object placed in a known orbital distance from a known mass.