Science as I understand is based on theories that are tested: conclusions are drawn based on the evidence used to test those theories. Are you suggesting that religion should replace science or an area of science in particular? <>
Science as I understand is based on theories that are tested: conclusions are drawn based on the evidence used to test those theories. Are you suggesting that religion should replace science or an area of science in particular? No, religion is based purely on faith, nothing else is required. It is primarily circular logic. Science however is based on evidence and observation.
That is why on threads like this the religious try to use pure logic (based on faulty assumptions) to try and 'prove' their position. Reality though is based on what actually is, not a logical construct in somebodies mind.