“Again, we’re not talking about Code....”
ahhh, the method or algorithms use for error correction are called “error correction CODEs, commonly abbreviated ECCs.”
So if you are not talking about that, what are you talking about?
The question is rhetorical.
Hank
You are bringign two very different issues to hte table Hank- it’s hard to even follow your arguments as a result- I spoke about (and explained several times now) that hte discussion was abotu sender/receiver communication method, and not the code itself- you’ve been tryign to steer the conversation toward the code itself to support your argument I guess- if you’ll go back several posts, you will see that we were discussing the need for shannon theory which deals again, with sender receiver- not hte code itself- Code without the ability to be sent and received is useless information, and can not by itself sustain life in a fit condition- the species would fail to thrive without having a pre-existing method of sendign and receiving that code. It is this method of sendign and receiving that is vital to life, and again, this MUST all be present before life can even happen, and it MUSt be intelligently designed, and cooperate with many vital key systems such as Metainformation (code) that is forward looking and which anticipates errors in order to keep the species fit and viable